Share of voice
Your slice of AI answers against each competitor, and its change.
A visibility number means little on its own. Gensiv puts it next to the competitors you lose deals to, question by question and engine by engine, so you know exactly who is winning the answer and by how much.
| Brand | #1 | #2 | #3 | #4 | #5 | #6+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cadence | 31% | 27% | 18% | 11% | 7% | 6% |
Tasklane | 48% | 22% | 13% | 8% | 5% | 4% |
Orbitly | 19% | 26% | 24% | 15% | 9% | 7% |
Planwise | 9% | 17% | 25% | 22% | 15% | 12% |
Stackboard | 4% | 9% | 16% | 24% | 21% | 26% |
Answers captured from 6 AI engines, in every market you sell in.
Track the same neutral buying questions for every brand, on the same schedule, and measure how often each one appears in the answers. The questions must not name any brand, or they will surface that brand and tell you nothing. The share each brand holds across those answers is its AI share of voice.
Shown with demo data for Cadence, a fictional project management brand, and four fictional rivals.
| # | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tasklane | 47% | 29% | 71 | 1.8 |
| 2 | Cadence | 41% | 25% | 78 | 2.4 |
| 3 | Orbitly | 34% | 21% | 64 | 2.9 |
| 4 | Planwise | 24% | 15% | 58 | 3.6 |
| 5 | Stackboard | 13% | 10% | 42 | 4.4 |
Everything below is part of every plan.
Your slice of AI answers against each competitor, and its change.
Every brand's visibility on one chart, day by day.
Visibility, share, sentiment and position for every brand.
How often each brand is the first recommendation.
Last updated
Three to five is usually right: enough to see the shape of the market, few enough that the comparison stays readable. Gensiv tracks up to 10 per brand, so there is room for a wider set in a crowded category. Prioritise the ones your sales team meets in deals.